Martyn,
        The use of rolled chords, like so many things in early music
   performance, has to be assigned to the "inconclusive" category. Lack of
   evidence does not mean lack of practice. For example, the subject is
   rarely mentioned in modern classical guitar methods even though it is a
   ubiquitous. Rolling may just have been one of those things that was
   done without comment.
       Who knows? As always, our primary concern should not be with how
   "informed" we are, but whether or not what we do enhances the music.
   Chris

   Christopher Wilke
   Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
   www.christopherwilke.com
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: Martyn Hodgson <[email protected]>
   To: WALSH STUART <[email protected]>
   Cc: lute <[email protected]>
   Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 8:58 AM
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Re/deconstructing Dowland; - and 'rolled' chords
     Regarding 'rolled' chords also raised in this thread, these seem to
   be
     (too?) ubiquitous in this repertoire nowadays and early sources (ie
     pre-17th century) don't generally describe the technique. Only when
   we
     get to the French 17th century lute with separe signs and the like is
     the expectation for such fully upwards arpeggiated chords clear. Even
     Barley, a perhaps unfairly maligned source, indicates a technique for
     playing full 6 note chords or open 5 note chords not too far removed
     from that described by later sources (including Mace and Burwell's
     teacher as well as by continental instructions), in which the first
     finger rakes upwards (ie towards the bass) to cover some of the
   courses
     whilst the second and third fingers strike the others. I would
   suggest
     this was more common than we often suppose nowadays and perhaps led
     onto the later practice of playing the bass and simultaneously raking
     up with the first finger - with the possible added sophistication of
     restriking the highest course or two with the second finger - almost
     the opposite of a modern 'rolled' chord.
     Martyn
     --- On Thu, 15/11/12, WALSH STUART <[1][email protected]> wrote:
       From: WALSH STUART <[2][email protected]>
       Subject: [LUTE] Re: Reconstructing Dowland; deconstructing Dowland
       To: "David van Ooijen" <[3][email protected]>
       Cc: "lute" <[4][email protected]>
       Date: Thursday, 15 November, 2012, 23:01
         Beautiful playing. I wouldn't have known this was a modern
         reconstruction. But I don't know the music well and I haven't
     listened
         to Dowland in a long time and I don't try and play the music.
         But I'm very, very surprised (and intrigued and amused)  that it
     needs
         reconstruction, DIY or otherwise. Two questions:
         a) where does this idea leave all the great performances of
   Dowland
     and
         those CD compilations of the complete works?  Lindberg, North.
     O'Dette,
         Chris Wilson etc. They simply didn't notice any fundamental
   issues
     with
         the music?
         b) is Dowland's music uniquely flawed? (needs extra parts, needs
         cliched florid bits excised, need voice-leading corrected etc).
     Dowland
         is often  posed as the pinnacle of Renaissance  lute music. If
   the
         sources of his music is fundamentally compromised, where does
   that
         leave all the other lute music of the Renaissance? Does it all
   need
     a
         bit of modern polishing into shape too?
         (and how is a modern person somehow seeing through the sources to
     what
         Dowland would have wanted beyond the abundant evidence of what
     people
         at the time physically recorded in the tablatures?)
         Stuart
         On 15 November 2012 22:07, David van Ooijen
         <[1][1][5][email protected]> wrote:
         On 15 November 2012 22:12, WALSH STUART
   <[2][2][6][email protected]>
         wrote:
         >    Well, isn't anyone other than Dan going to reply to this? I
   was
         >    expecting a huge response!
           My (two but) latest CD is a response: two 'new' Dowland solos
   `a
     la
           dt,
           albeit reconstructed and played by DvO. ;-)
           In other words: dt is right, DIY-Dowland is the way to go!
           David
           I even uploaded both arrangements to YouTube:
           [3][3][7]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
           [4][4][8]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
           --
           *******************************
           David van Ooijen
           [5][5][9][email protected]
           [6]www.davidvanooijen.nl
           *******************************
         To get on or off this list see list information at
         [7][6][10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
         --
     References
         1. mailto:[7][11][email protected]
         2. mailto:[8][12][email protected]
         3. [9][13]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
         4. [10][14]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
         5. mailto:[11][15][email protected]
         6. [12][16]http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
         7. [13][17]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     --
   References
     1.
   [18]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
   l.com
     2.
   [19]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     3. [20]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
     4. [21]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
     5.
   [22]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
   l.com
     6. [23]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     7.
   [24]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
   l.com
     8.
   [25]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     9. [26]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
     10. [27]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
     11.
   [28]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
   l.com
     12. [29]http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
     13. [30]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. mailto:[email protected]
   4. mailto:[email protected]
   5. mailto:[email protected]
   6. mailto:[email protected]
   7. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
   8. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
   9. mailto:[email protected]
  10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  11. mailto:[email protected]
  12. mailto:[email protected]
  13. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
  14. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
  15. mailto:[email protected]
  16. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
  17. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  18. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  19. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  20. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
  21. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
  22. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  23. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  24. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  25. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  26. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
  27. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
  28. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  29. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
  30. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to