Dear Chris,

   Perhaps 'rolled' chords were common -  as you say, there's no early
   evidence for them which may mean they were not used or if used then not
   reported.  But we do know that other ways of playing chords were
   reported so why not this one if it were practised?

   And I see no conflict between being 'informed' and, even, practising
   historical techniques with enhancing the music: the two are not
   mutually exclusive. Indeed some might suggest that employing historical
   technique serves the music and the composers' intentions best and so
   further enhances the music.

   Martyn
   --- On Fri, 16/11/12, Christopher Wilke <[email protected]> wrote:

     From: Christopher Wilke <[email protected]>
     Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: Re/deconstructing Dowland; - and 'rolled'
     chords
     To: "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]>, "WALSH STUART"
     <[email protected]>
     Cc: "lute" <[email protected]>
     Date: Friday, 16 November, 2012, 14:28

   Martyn,
        The use of rolled chords, like so many things in early music
   performance, has to be assigned to the "inconclusive" category. Lack of
   evidence does not mean lack of practice. For example, the subject is
   rarely mentioned in modern classical guitar methods even though it is a
   ubiquitous. Rolling may just have been one of those things that was
   done without comment.
       Who knows? As always, our primary concern should not be with how
   "informed" we are, but whether or not what we do enhances the music.
   Chris

   Christopher Wilke
   Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
   www.christopherwilke.com
   ----- Original Message -----

   Re [LUTE] Re: Re/deconstructing Dowland; - and 'rolled' chords
   Friday, 16 November, 2012 13:58
   From: "Martyn Hodgson" [1][email protected]
   To: "WALSH STUART" <[email protected]>
   Cc: "lute" <[email protected]>
      Dear Stuart,
      I agree with you that we need to be wary in our (modern) assessments
   of
      many of these works.
      For example, some of these lute 'solos', both by Dowland and other
   lute
      playing composers, may be lute parts to a consort or a duet and can
      seem strangely incomplete whilst still fooling modern editors (eg
      Holborne's 'The Cradle' in Dd.2.11.  - noted on page 8 of the recent
      Lute Society edition),  so we need to be careful before discarding
   them
      onto the scrap heap of musical spam.  I'm also uneasy of imposing
   our
      ideas of what was the 'right' harmonic practice at the time: 'crude'
      harmonies might be as much a stylistic trait as a sign of
   compositional
      rudeness.
      Regarding 'rolled' chords also raised in this thread, these seem to
   be
      (too?) ubiquitous in this repertoire nowadays and early sources (ie
      pre-17th century) don't generally describe the technique. Only when
   we
      get to the French 17th century lute with separe signs and the like
   is
      the expectation for such fully upwards arpeggiated chords clear.
   Even
      Barley, a perhaps unfairly maligned source, indicates a technique
   for
      playing full 6 note chords or open 5 note chords not too far removed
      from that described by later sources (including Mace and Burwell's
      teacher as well as by continental instructions), in which the first
      finger rakes upwards (ie towards the bass) to cover some of the
   courses
      whilst the second and third fingers strike the others. I would
   suggest
      this was more common than we often suppose nowadays and perhaps led
      onto the later practice of playing the bass and simultaneously
   raking
      up with the first finger - with the possible added sophistication of
      restriking the highest course or two with the second finger - almost
      the opposite of a modern 'rolled' chord.
      Martyn


      --- On Thu, 15/11/12, WALSH STUART <[2][email protected]> wrote:
       From: WALSH STUART <[3][email protected]>
       Subject: [LUTE] Re: Reconstructing Dowland; deconstructing Dowland
       To: "David van Ooijen" <[4][email protected]>
       Cc: "lute" <[5][email protected]>
       Date: Thursday, 15 November, 2012, 23:01
         Beautiful playing. I wouldn't have known this was a modern
         reconstruction. But I don't know the music well and I haven't
     listened
         to Dowland in a long time and I don't try and play the music.
         But I'm very, very surprised (and intrigued and amused)  that it
     needs
         reconstruction, DIY or otherwise. Two questions:
         a) where does this idea leave all the great performances of
   Dowland
     and
         those CD compilations of the complete works?  Lindberg, North.
     O'Dette,
         Chris Wilson etc. They simply didn't notice any fundamental
   issues
     with
         the music?
         b) is Dowland's music uniquely flawed? (needs extra parts, needs
         cliched florid bits excised, need voice-leading corrected etc).
     Dowland
         is often  posed as the pinnacle of Renaissance  lute music. If
   the
         sources of his music is fundamentally compromised, where does
   that
         leave all the other lute music of the Renaissance? Does it all
   need
     a
         bit of modern polishing into shape too?
         (and how is a modern person somehow seeing through the sources to
     what
         Dowland would have wanted beyond the abundant evidence of what
     people
         at the time physically recorded in the tablatures?)
         Stuart
         On 15 November 2012 22:07, David van Ooijen
         <[1][1][6][email protected]> wrote:
         On 15 November 2012 22:12, WALSH STUART
   <[2][2][7][email protected]>
         wrote:
         >    Well, isn't anyone other than Dan going to reply to this? I
   was
         >    expecting a huge response!
           My (two but) latest CD is a response: two 'new' Dowland solos
   `a
     la
           dt,
           albeit reconstructed and played by DvO. ;-)
           In other words: dt is right, DIY-Dowland is the way to go!
           David
           I even uploaded both arrangements to YouTube:
           [3][3][8]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
           [4][4][9]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
           --
           *******************************
           David van Ooijen
           [5][5][10][email protected]
           [6]www.davidvanooijen.nl
           *******************************
         To get on or off this list see list information at
         [7][6][11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
         --
     References
         1. mailto:[7][12][email protected]
         2. mailto:[8][13][email protected]
         3. [9][14]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
         4. [10][15]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
         5. mailto:[11][16][email protected]
         6. [12][17]http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
         7. [13][18]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     --
   References
     1.
   [19]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
   l.com
     2.
   [20]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     3. [21]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
     4. [22]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
     5.
   [23]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
   l.com
     6. [24]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     7.
   [25]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
   l.com
     8.
   [26]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
     9. [27]http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
     10. [28]http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
     11.
   [29]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%C3%9Avidvanooijen@gmai
   l.com
     12. [30]http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
     13. [31]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   3. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   4. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
   5. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   6. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
   7. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   8. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
   9. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
  10. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  12. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  13. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  14. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
  15. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
  16. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  17. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
  18. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  19. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  20. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  21. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
  22. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
  23. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  24. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  25. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  26. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  27. http://youtu.be/1tSrVURBLfs
  28. http://youtu.be/UcfQSeYUK_M
  29. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to%c3%[email protected]
  30. http://www.davidvanooijen.nl/
  31. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to