Dear Howard et al,

   Isn't cutting a note short "articulating" by definition, regardless of
   what one does with all the other notes? Articulation isn't necessarily
   deliberate - it can be an involuntary consequence of what you call
   choppy playing, or it can be part of a carefully-planned performance
   (though the former is probably easier to justify historically).

   I don't think you've done justice to the "first rule" I mentioned in my
   post. Most authors write about holding down the fingers for as long as
   possible, that is, sustaining the notes for as long as possible. This
   is not the same as avoiding "stopping notes prematurely". Whether the
   rule relates to establishing good technique or creating a certain kind
   of sound world (or both) is up for debate. If we see it as refering to
   an aesthetic preference and take it literally then yes, it is evidence
   against stopping notes for whatever purpose.

   I have great respect for Paul O'Dette's playing and I have nothing
   against articulation per se. However, much of what we take for granted
   has absolutely no historical precedent. When articulated playing is
   regarded as a "period performance practice technique" and "historically
   informed", whereas legato is called "totally modern", I take issue.

   As far as I know, Mace is the only author to describe shortening notes
   (not specifically bass notes) on the lute. He considers this effect an
   ornament (along with Piano/Forte and Pauses, among other things). He
   writes "it will seem to speak the word tut" - perhaps we should use
   this ornament as often as we would say the word "tut" in a sentence?

   On several occasions Mace refers to his dissatisfaction with the long
   bass strings on the theorbo and their "snarling together". Tellingly,
   he does NOT suggest articulating the bass notes here as a solution.
   Instead he suggests playing the basses softer, though admits that this
   is not an ideal solution. He seems to regard this problem as intrinsic
   to the nature of the instrument.

   In other places, Mace praises playing which is "smooth and clean". On
   several occasions he describes a kind of over-legato effect: "Thus
   holding of your letters stopt, all the while, will give a very fine
   sound, or gingle beyond any other way of play". Other than the "tut"
   Mace never mentions anything about what we today call articulation, or
   indeed musical phrasing. Since he writes about virtually everything
   else, I think this is significant.

   Personally, I feel that many performers today overarticulate, and this
   can have the effect of introducing unpleasant accents and (moreover)
   reducing the volume/resonance of the instrument. The lute, especially
   when strung in gut, can be seen as a self-articulating instrument - why
   exaggerate this characteristic?

   I anticipate your reply!

   Sam

   On 21 February 2013 20:13, howard posner <[1][email protected]>
   wrote:

   On Feb 21, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Sam Chapman <[2][email protected]>
   wrote:
   > There is far more evidence for a legato
   >   way of playing. One of the first rules we learn on the lute is to
   hold
   >   down the left hand fingers until they are needed for another note -
   >   doesn't this indicate a desire for sustaining the resonance of the
   >   instrument, rather than cutting it short (i.e. articulating).

     Cutting a note short amounts to "articulating" only if it's a
     contrast to other notes.  If all the notes are short, it's just
     choppy playing, and deliberately shortening a note is pointless if
     that note is surrounded by notes that are inadvertently shortened.
     So evidence of a preference for not inadvertently stopping notes
     prematurely through poor technique 1) is not evidence against
     preventing a bass note from ringing beyond its written value, and 2)
     is not evidence against stopping stopping notes for expressive
     purposes.
     This doesn't settle the question of whether Weiss (for example)
     would have been perfectly satisfied with how his basses sounded
     without damping them.
     O'Dette is a master at controlling the ends of notes, and it's the
     reason he makes contrapuntal voice-leading dizzyingly obvious:  a
     note that comes after silence is
     emphasized.
     --

   To get on or off this list see list information at

     [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

   --
   Sam Chapman
   Oetlingerstrasse 65
   4057 Basel
   (0041) 79 530 39 91

   --

References

   1. mailto:[email protected]
   2. mailto:[email protected]
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to