Very interesting. Spent some time drooling over the flickrpics you so kindly provided. Magnificent- beautiful, perfectly proportioned; string spacing doesn't appear unnaturally wide. 65 cm SL is a perfect length (to my predilection vis-a-vis hands, body size, pitch) & the apparent distances all seem to fit aesthetically. But a certain imprecision in the term "Double" wide provokes a desire to know the actual measurements; string to string, and course to course- at the nut and at the bridge. Do tell, please!

I would imagine that Andreas did more than adjust the spacing to improve the polyphonic response- any subtle tweaking of the bowl proportions or soundboard construction? And if a lute that has been built for the best polyphonic response is also superior for ricercars, ensembles, and lute songs one has to ask- "What is it not good for?"- it surely doesn't sound as if there was some trade-off, or sacrifice. Just sounds like the best possible lute in the world, which is only true if it beats out my own Larson 8 course- which also came with a slightly wider spacing than I was used to, and also has a fantastic sound.

Looking forward to you posting some good, clear polyphony and more with the new beast. Thanks for sharing.

Dan

On 8/22/2013 3:01 PM, David Tayler wrote:
    Over the years I have tried out a number of ideas for a model of lute
    that is good for polyphony. Specifically, I wanted something for both
    playing and recording that reveals the maximum separation in the
    individual polyphonic parts, with tone and transparency. What I have
    now is a 65cm C36 lute copy, with shaded yew, and "double wide"
    spacing. The space is larger between the pairs of strings, and each
    pair is wider between the unisons and octaves.
    It does result in a more transparent sound for polyphony. However, not
    recommended for smaller hands.
    If you play the theorbo, it will seem small anyway.
    Actually, the transparency is also good for ricercars, even though the
    music is not as complex, but where you really hear the difference is in
    the multipart compositions, and also lute songs. The width takes some
    getting used to, and I will also try a model with the same spacing and
    a smaller mensur, when I get around to it.
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/42226428@N03/sets/72157635192655310/

    --


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to