On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:23:03 +0100, R. Mattes wrote
>

I hate to follow up my own posts.

> (f bflat) [1]. To be followed by a chain of 2nd chords ... Yes, we
> all know that a 7-6 chain can be inverted (double counterpoint) into
> a 2-3 chain but we also know this doesn't work with a third voice
> running a third above the bass (since the fith between this voice
> and the 7th would invert into a (false/wrong) forth.

Another consideration speaking against this wrong counterpoint: in
this type of 7-6 chain the top/solo voice often sings/plays the
dissonance. While doubling the top voice seems to be perfectly fine
for most 17th century BC treaties, the inverted version would put the
dissonance into the bass and we would end up with parallel octaves
between soloist and bass voice - which is definitely _not_ fine at
all.

Cheers, RalfD



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to