Look at Victor Coelho's  article for a discussion of lute Fantasies
   ascribed to Francesco da Milano that are likely not by him.
   [1]http://people.bu.edu/blues/documents/Coelho_Cavalcanti.pdf

   Best,

   Susan Sandman

   Elizabethan Conversation.com
   On Saturday, October 29, 2016, AJN <[2][email protected]> wrote:

        Ron Andrico wrote:
        "There seems to
        be a tendency to attribute unascribed music to known composers
     simply
        because a given piece is good. This is certainly the case with
     many
        pieces attributed to Francesco da Milano."
        I am unaware of any pieces attributed to Francesco that are
        unascribed in sources.
        Can you provide some examples?
        On 09/29/16, Ron Andrico<[email protected]> wrote:
        From the archives...
        ___________________________________________________________
     _______
        From: Ron Andrico <[1][email protected]>
        Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2007 10:38 AM
        To: Are Vidar Boye Hansen; G.R. Crona
        Cc: [2][email protected]
        Subject: RE: [LUTE] Re: Poulton #73 [was] dedillo
        Dear Are:
        Diana Poulton attributed the piece (with reservation) to Dowland
     based
        on the fact that it contains several of Dowland's typical
     devices; the
        ascending scale passages with a repeated first note, and several
        tonic/dominant repetitions with inversions. The piece also
     appears in
        the manuscript (D9) following another fantasia more securely
     attributed
        to Dowland (Poulton #6). I have to agree with you that Poulton
     #73
        doesn't necessarily sound like Dowland, and the fact that the
     piece
        really needs reconstruction does not help the matter. There seems
     to
        be a tendency to attribute unascribed music to known composers
     simply
        because a given piece is good. This is certainly the case with
     many
        pieces attributed to Francesco da Milano.
        Best wishes,
        Ron Andrico
        [1][3][3]http://www.mignarda.com
        > Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 23:28:35 +0100
        > To: [4][email protected]
        > CC: [5][email protected]
        > From: [6][email protected]
        > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Poulton #73 [was] dedillo
        > Does any of you know why this piece is attributed to Dowland?
     It is a
        > great piece, but to me it doesn't sound like a Dowland piece...
        >
        >
        > Are
        ___________________________________________________________
     _______
        Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live
        OneCare! [2]Try now!
        --
        References
        1. [7][4]http://www.mignarda.com/
        2.
        [8][5]http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.as
     px?s_cid=wl_
        hotmailnews
        To get on or off this list see list information at
        [9][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
     References
        1. mailto:[email protected]
        2. mailto:[email protected]
        3. [7]http://www.mignarda.com/
        4. mailto:[email protected]
        5. mailto:[email protected]
        6. mailto:[email protected]
        7. [8]http://www.mignarda.com/
        8. [9]http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?
     s_cid=wl_hotmailnews
        9. [10]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/

   --

References

   1. http://people.bu.edu/blues/documents/Coelho_Cavalcanti.pdf
   2. javascript:_e({},'cvml','[email protected]');
   3. http://www.mignarda.com/
   4. http://www.mignarda.com/
   5. http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?s_cid=wl_
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   7. http://www.mignarda.com/
   8. http://www.mignarda.com/
   9. 
http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?s_cid=wl_hotmailnews
  10. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/

Reply via email to