Hi Julian and Russell, thanks for your thoughts.
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012, Julian wrote: > On 03/12/12 13:47, Peter Ross wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I wonder whether I can prevent outgoing "bulk e-mail". > > However, theres more than one way to send "bulk" email. If its collating all > recipients in the To: header, the mail transport will disburse separate > emails for each (rcpt to: ), essentially keeping the body of the email > intact including the To: header - don't see many of those anymore. So I > wouldn't assume that it would be sent that way. I had this method in mind. I guess he would have done it that way, having all addresses in Outlook. > Perhaps you should've disable his account a few seconds after his threat. I agree but I wasn't deciding. In general I don't like fixing social problems through technology, and try to stay out of it. For non-technical staff it is sometimes hard to understand why it is so difficult to implement requests as "Let John send all e-mails besides of the one that may be malicious." Should be easy, because: "You do it all the time, filtering spam." So the thought goes. Regards Peter _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
