On 25/08/13 6:06 PM, Russell Coker wrote: > There is no possibility for avoiding duplicate insurance without becoming an > LA subcommittee. Insurance and resource sharing are certainly two valid reasons to explore the disincorporation/merger proposal. I have an open mind on this, but the arguments have swung my thoughts more towards being in favour of the proposal. > Most members of LUV would disagree with that. I expect that most members > consider the existance of LUV to be determined by the mailing lists running > and the meetings being held. I'd certainly like to see the "LUV" name go on in some fashion, even if not officially (legally) in existence.
-- 73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL http://vkradio.com _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
