On Wed, September 4, 2013 9:30 am, Jason White wrote: > I hope the underlying concerns can be addressed well before next year's > meeting. > > The failure of the motion yesterday gives Luv time for a proper review of > the issues.
Well, for some, whom seem hell bent on ensuring the the d14n takes place, there will be lots of convincing to do before d14n can be accepted. For most others whom are happy to keep LUV and LA as completely separate entities, well, all that will be needed is to /fix/ up the issues with the organization's current rules (modernize and review / adjust as required by the governing law) and also ensure that the rules of LUV reflect properly the actual practice ... ie how one becomes a member, how proxy voting must be handled and perhaps how future voting might take place via electronic means. All in all, the rules will need to go through the proper processes to be changed appropriately and I would expect that to require another formal meeting (or more) for discussion and acceptance. Cheers A. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
