On 3 September 2013 23:50, Russell Coker <[email protected]> wrote:
> The case for not merging with LA was based on the idea that a future LA > committee might go crazy or merely have interests that don't coincide with > those of LUV. That was apparently a convincing argument to some people as > the > motion was not carried. > One of the problems with that idea is that AGM attendence is as low as 16 > which isn't a statistically significant sampling of LUV members. So even > excluding the possibility of 16 people with an agenda attending to take > over > there's a much better chance of a committee not representing the membership > than there is with the much larger voting numbers for LA elections. > > How many people submitted proxy votes? In the last LA election we had 111 people vote. The risk of an unrepresentative group is further minimised by LA elections being conducted on line. If a council went crazy members could call an SGM and vote to remove them.
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
