On Wed, 4 Sep 2013 05:34:22 PM Andrew McGlashan wrote: > Sounds to me that the committee is pissed that this didn't get up.
Four people spoke on the motion, two for and two against. All were committee members (IIRC). I would suggest that we all leave this issue alone now and instead help to make LUV compliant with the current and new rules. All the best, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC This email may come with a PGP signature as a file. Do not panic. For more info see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
