Julien Goodwin wrote: > On 07/05/14 12:31, Trent W. Buck wrote: >> The *only* reason heartbleed is getting mainstream media attention, is >> because the researchers invested more effort into registering a catchy >> domain name and designing a cute logo, than on responsible disclosure. > > Given they're my coworkers I take umbrage to that. The Finnish team who > (apparently) rediscovered this after it was already disclosed to the > OpenSSL team by researchers at Google did do some of the publicity, but > by that point the patch was already ready, the openssl team were simply > taking time on the release to try and coordinate it. > > I've seen nothing showing anything but responsible disclosure from all > sides on this issue (others, even others involving Google researchers sure).
Shrug. If I'm poorly informed, I apologize. Certainly I'm not happy with the OpenSSL people, either :-)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
