> 
> I had been emailing Don Armstrong, a DD, about my concerns.
> 
> One very worrying aspect of that was the choice was either systemd or
> upstart; there should have been a third option to continue entirely with
> the status quo of sysvinit -- that third option wasn't a consideration.
> 

Got a citation for that?

Everything I've read is that the vote was for one of 5 choices:
"
  D    systemd 
  U    upstart
  O    openrc
  V    sysvinit (no change)
  F    requires further discussion
"

And that there was only one vote for the status quo, and that person voted for 
further discussion in preference to that.

(https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2014/02/msg00281.html)

James

_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to