-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 14/10/2014 10:53 AM, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Andrew McGlashan <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 13/10/2014 1:07 PM, Trent W. Buck wrote: >>> "We remain gravely concerned about the viability of this port. >>> [...] >>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/09/msg00002.html >> >>> Well, that was an /old/ report, [...] >> I'll re-post the rest of what I wrote, [...] >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/10/msg00146.html > > Mea culpa; I didn't realize that your cite was later than my cite > :-)
I don't think it is that clear cut yet, so I'm actually trying to get some kind of indication as to the actual status, rather than what can be perceived by that later post. This is my post to that cause: https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2014/10/msg00217.html Thanks A. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iF4EAREIAAYFAlQ8Z8gACgkQqBZry7fv4vv4gQEAtm3pbpWIclWSnIoKZazte883 bW9DeihqjM0S5PMEfasA/j21EMxp5WsrvBjipTD4JSVCpCp4ovlEiUmQZoHItlg1 =ipCL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
