On 2/02/2016 1:17 PM, Russell Coker via luv-main wrote:
> Also the LUV server has had IPv6 enabled for a while and I have already 
> noticed problems for one user.  A member of this list has their mail server 
> configured to do callbacks but is not correctly configured for IPv6.  So they 
> have been rejecting mail from the LUV list because their anti-spam measure 
> isn't working with any site that advertises an AAAA record.  One could argue 
> that I should remove AAAA records to deal with that sort of problem (and all 
> the other IPv6 problems that people might have).  But I think that IPv6 is 
> necessary and inevitable.  Implementing it on the LUV server is a service for 
> LUV members as it provides an IPv6 test bed and I sent a personal email to 
> the 
> person with the mailing list problem explaining it to them so they can fix 
> their issue - they will never get email from a Google sysadmin about problems 
> talking to Google Groups.

I agree, IPv6 is here, and it's not LUV's job to make their servers work
with broken IPv6 systems.  It's up to those with broken systems to fix them.
> 
> I don't know if the LUV site even works on Windows XP.  There are many 
> potential ways in which it might break and I never test with Windows.  If 
> someone on this list would like to test the site with various versions of 
> Windows I'd be interested to see the results.  I won't commit to fixing such 
> issues but we can definitely have a discussion about the pros and cons of 
> various configuration options.

I've only tried on Windows 7 (with Firefox), and it seemed to work fine.
> 


-- 
73 de Tony VK3JED/VK3IRL
http://vkradio.com
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to