On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:35:11PM +1000, Russell Coker via luv-main wrote: > Is there any good FOSS distributed database that's not a heap of Maven > rubbish > that can't be supported in a distribution? I've been briefly looking > at Cockroach, Hbase, Voldemort, Ignite Accumulo, and of course I had > tried Cassandra at a LUV event.
What properties do you (not) need? Considering your list; I'll recommend Anna. Page 3 of Anna's paper references 20; including 3/5 from your list Hbase, Voldemort, and Cassandra. https://dsf.berkeley.edu/jmh/papers/anna_ieee18.pdf#page=3 > All the ones I looked at in detail couldn't be packaged for Debian > because they used Maven for the build system and a build process that > downloads java programs from the web doesn't fit with reproducible > builds. I presume that the others which aren't in Debian are in a > similar situation. Anna is written in C++ with the usual cmake build process. No Java. https://github.com/hydro-project/anna https://hydro-project.github.io/ https://databeta.wordpress.com/2018/03/09/anna-kvs/ https://rise.cs.berkeley.edu/blog/going-fast-and-cheap-how-we-made-anna-autoscale/ I discovered Anna while following 'The Morning Paper'. This site has a very high signal to noise ratio. https://blog.acolyer.org/2018/03/27/anna-a-kvs-for-any-scale/ https://blog.acolyer.org/ > Does anyone know of a good candidate that could be packaged for > Debian? Failing that which of the ones that suck too badly for > inclusion in Debian don't suck so badly that they are horrible to use? I don't believe Anna is packaged on Debian. It shouldn't be difficult to add. The table on page 3 points to many alternatives, some of which may be packaged. Anna is Apache-2 licensed and its last commit was on the 9th of May. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main
