Julian Anastasov <[email protected]> wrote: > Change the old hlist_bl_first_rcu to hlist_bl_first_rcu_dereference > to indicate that it is a RCU dereference. > > Add hlist_bl_next_rcu and hlist_bl_first_rcu to use RCU pointers > and use them to fix sparse warnings. > > Add hlist_bl_for_each_entry_continue_rcu. > > Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]> > --- > include/linux/rculist_bl.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Are the RCU maintainers OK with this? An explicit Ack or RvB would be good to have.
