Hello,On Thu, 23 Oct 2025, Florian Westphal wrote: > Julian Anastasov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Change the old hlist_bl_first_rcu to hlist_bl_first_rcu_dereference > > to indicate that it is a RCU dereference. > > > > Add hlist_bl_next_rcu and hlist_bl_first_rcu to use RCU pointers > > and use them to fix sparse warnings. > > > > Add hlist_bl_for_each_entry_continue_rcu. > > > > Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <[email protected]> > > --- > > include/linux/rculist_bl.h | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > Are the RCU maintainers OK with this? > An explicit Ack or RvB would be good to have. Paul McKenney requested on 15 Aug 2023 some changes for 1st version: https://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-devel/2023-08/msg00044.html And they are now present in v2+: https://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-devel/2023-08/msg00057.html So, the RCU change is expected to be ack-ed after the other patches are accepted. I'm also expecting review and ack from Simon, so that we can finally include the patchset to -next... Regards -- Julian Anastasov <[email protected]>
