On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Gerry Reno wrote: > After looking at my LVS load balancing options 1-LAN or 2-LAN, in > conjunction with my other needs such as ease of access to services such > as shared storage, I'm going to set things up as 1-LAN. Now is 1-LAN > just as reliable as 2-LAN?
The reasons for two networks are o you get two ports for the director to talk out of (twice the bandwidth) o the inside and the outside are isolated traffic-wise, ie no-one on the outside gets to see traffic in the inside. If you have other restraints that override these, then by all means use a one-network LVS. > Also, I'm going to put the load balancers > for now in QEMU virtual machines and use VDE2 virtual switch to connect > to the Host LAN. Has anyone done this using QEMU and VDE2 yet? no, but we'd be delighted to hear how you do it. Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
