Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Gerry Reno wrote: > > Can't read your ascii diagram, but it seems like I've seen > it before. Have you posted on this setup recently. > > > >> The general setup is a single Inet NAT Router/GW box connected to a >> switch (multi-VLAN 801q capable) that connects to all the servers. The >> physical servers for this discussion are two web servers, two sql >> servers, one shared storage server, two email servers, two file servers. >> For simplicity lets just focus on the web and sql servers and the shared >> storage server. >> > > you have two directors balancing http,sql (maybe the > clients access the http and the http accesses the > sql), smtp. There is a file server. This is a standard LVS. > There's no need for one network here. > > >> Just need to setup LVS and keepalived on load balancers add a >> POSTROUTING rule on the load balancers and drop the default route on the >> real servers (do I have that right?) >> > > it's in the HOWTO. > > >> Hints? >> > > looks like a standard LVS to me. > > Joe > > Ok, I think the only difference is that the clients access the http which accesses the sql, but the sql again is load balanced rather than pairing web/sql servers. But you're right, basically standard LVS pretty much. Back to the HOWTO...
_______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
