On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Bryan Aldridge wrote: > Joe thanks for the reply! Tim Mooney's post was the one I > was referring to. In his post here > http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2007-09/msg00036.html
funny how he was doing it for years before anyone found out about it. > you can see his output and how he has a high number of > inactive connections, where as mine is the opposite. I am > using TLS, umm, TLS (thread local storage?) just affects the application, not the networking, right? > but nothing is going through ldaps://, that is port 636. > Read-only is what I'm after here too. Good thinking on > the TCPdump. I may give that a shot. you'll need to do it on the director and realserver to get the whole picture. > Actually I have a virtual http server set up as well using > DR, and its working great - shows lots of inactive > connections (like it should). that's good to know. gl. Joe -- Joseph Mack NA3T EME(B,D), FM05lw North Carolina jmack (at) wm7d (dot) net - azimuthal equidistant map generator at http://www.wm7d.net/azproj.shtml Homepage http://www.austintek.com/ It's GNU/Linux! _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
