In regard to: Re: [lvs-users] LDAP and LVS-DR problems, Joseph Mack NA3T...:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Bryan Aldridge wrote: > >> Joe thanks for the reply! Tim Mooney's post was the one I >> was referring to. In his post here >> http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2007-09/msg00036.html > > funny how he was doing it for years before anyone found out > about it. What's funnier is that I haven't been paying any attention to the lvs-users mailing list for a couple weeks, and the first message I happen to look at has my name in it. ;-) As I said in my original post that Bryan is referring to, all the LVS infrastructure was set up by someone else long ago. I didn't become responsible for it until later, and I didn't join the lvs-users mailing list until later still. I didn't know there was anything special about LDAP and LVS-DR until it was mentioned on the list. We really have had it working in our environment for a very long time. >> you can see his output and how he has a high number of >> inactive connections, where as mine is the opposite. I am >> using TLS, > > umm, TLS (thread local storage?) just affects the > application, not the networking, right? TLS == Transport Layer Security. It's very close to (but not quite the same) as SSL v3. Tim -- Tim Mooney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Enterprise Computing & Infrastructure 701-231-1076 (Voice) Room 242-J6, IACC Building 701-231-8541 (Fax) North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164 _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - [email protected] Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
