On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 22:13 +0100, Wagner Hans-Jörg wrote: > Hi again, > > Thanks for Jim's response. However Im realy not sure if I should use > the newest 1.2.0 release cause of the notice on savannah.nongnu > > "Note this release went without any release candidate cycles, so > beware, test well, and report back any bugs."
However, there have been few reports of problems against this release, so I think it's OK. > Could the persons providing the latest patches give some advice? Is it > the best approach to have 1.2.0 and applying all newest patches? Whats > about the patches before the date 1.2.0 was released, do I have to use > them as well? You shouldn't normally need to apply any patches. They aren't usually made against a release or intended for end users. The patches for lwIP are usually new features or bug fixes being contributed into lwIP, and they will (if we have time/they work/are good features etc) make it into CVS and then into the next release. lwIP has undergone a number of changes in CVS since the 1.2.0 release, so the next release will be a significant one. However, I would still recommend using 1.2.0 for now as CVS will be somewhat unstable and untested for the time being. Kieran _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
