[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Jonathan Larmour wrote: >> >> One workaround may be to dispense with the uses of sizeof for those DNS >> records in that file, and replace them with e.g. >> #define SIZEOF_DNS_ANSWER 10 >> and use that instead. The format and size is fixed after all. >> >> > Wouldn't that be working around a bug in a compiler (that doesn't > support structure packing) which we agreed not to do?
>From what he said, it does support structure packing, but still includes padding for alignment at the end. I agree that no structure packing at all would not be worth attempting to support. Jifl -- eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571 Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071. ------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
