>The above two settings are much too small to expect decent throughput, >and almost certainly explain the poor performance in the 2048-byte-write >capture you sent. You can probably get away with leaving TCP_WND alone >if you're acting purely as a sender of packets, but TCP_SND_BUF should >be as large as you can make it.
Kieran, can the PBUF_POOL_SIZE 6 also be a problem? Bill _______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
