*Based on the PPP spec:

Address:* In HDLC this is the address of the destination of the frame. But
in PPP we are dealing with a direct link between two devices, so this field
has no real meaning. It is thus always set to “11111111” (0xFF or 255
decimal), which is equivalent to a broadcast (it means “all stations”).

After the GPRS module CHAP negotiate

#####################

fsm_sdata(IPCP): Sent code 1,1,22.
IPCP: sending Configure-Request, id 1
IPCP: open state 2 (LS_CLOSED) -> 6 (LS_REQSENT)
Read 10 bytes:
7e 80 21 01 00 00 04 67 c3 7e                       ~.!....g.~
#######################

The address changed to 80.

Whether it will impact the fcs  check?

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 2:35 PM, yueyue papa <[email protected]> wrote:

> from the log the major problem is after CHAP success.
>
> Request peer address, and got a fcs error.
> #######################
> pppInProc[0]: got 10 bytes
> pppInput[0]: IPCP len=4
> fsm_input(IPCP):1,0,4
> fsm_rconfreq(IPCP): Rcvd id 0 state=6 (LS_REQSENT)
> ipcp_reqci: Requesting peer address
> ipcp_reqci: returning Configure-NAK
> pppWrite[0]: len=18
> Written 18 bytes:
> 7e ff 03 80 21 03 00 00 0a 03 06 00 00 00 00 a0     ~...!...........
> 3d 7e                                               =~
>
> fsm_sdata(IPCP): Sent code 3,0,10.
> Read 29 bytes:
> 7e 80 21 03 01 00 16 03 06 0d 0a 44 09 82 81 06     ~.!........D....
> d3 88 70 32 83 06 d3 88 14 cb bc a0 7e              ..p2........~
>
> pppInProc[0]: got 29 bytes
> pppInProc[0]: Dropping bad fcs 0xAD6A proto=0x8021
> #########################
>
>
> #########################
> fsm_sdata(IPCP): Sent code 1,2,14.
> IPCP: sending Configure-Request, id 2
> Read 21 bytes:
> 7e 80 21 04 02 00 0e 01 0d 0a 00 00 00 00 00 00     ~.!.............
> 00 00 66 f7 7e                                      ..f.~
>
> pppInProc[0]: got 21 bytes
> pppInProc[0]: Dropping bad fcs 0xFC02 proto=0x8021
> #########################
>
> I got many 29 and 21 bytes fcs error.
>
> How could I confirm this is really FCS error, or some other protocol ?
>
> Lee
>
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users

Reply via email to