Can i increase the size ov cRambuffer[2048].?Please help me.....
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send lwip-users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lwip-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: No delay between DHCP discoveries (HA) > 2. Re: No delay between DHCP discoveries (Bill Auerbach) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 01:34:56 -0700 (PDT) > From: HA <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [lwip-users] No delay between DHCP discoveries > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > I have to connect some level converters to the Uart to print out debug > messages. I did a grep of dhcp_discovery and it was only used inside > dhcp.c. > This file I have compared with the original and no difference. > > My thre timers run correctly, I can see it on the scope. Have no idea how > the webserver could trigger dhcp_discovery. Will go through the code. Any > other ideas? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/No-delay-between-DHCP-discoveries-tp21927p21938.html > Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:52:59 -0400 > From: "Bill Auerbach" <[email protected]> > To: "'Mailing list for lwIP users'" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [lwip-users] No delay between DHCP discoveries > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > I would update to the latest (1.4.1). Your version is 6 or 7 years out of > date. It shouldn't make a difference, but if it does, why debug something > that may already be debugged? Besides, there are *many* bug fixes and > features added over those years. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of HA > Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 4:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [lwip-users] No delay between DHCP discoveries > > I have to connect some level converters to the Uart to print out debug > messages. I did a grep of dhcp_discovery and it was only used inside > dhcp.c. > This file I have compared with the original and no difference. > > My thre timers run correctly, I can see it on the scope. Have no idea how > the webserver could trigger dhcp_discovery. Will go through the code. Any > other ideas? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > > http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/No-delay-between-DHCP-discoveries-tp21927p2193 > 8.html > Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > > End of lwip-users Digest, Vol 122, Issue 5 > ****************************************** >
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
