I use the BasicTFTP functions... i cant able to write data above 2000 bytes ....2000 is any limitation?how can i overcome the issue? please help me
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Bellphin Billu <[email protected]>wrote: > Can i increase the size ov cRambuffer[2048].?Please help me..... > > > On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 9:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Send lwip-users mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of lwip-users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: No delay between DHCP discoveries (HA) >> 2. Re: No delay between DHCP discoveries (Bill Auerbach) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 01:34:56 -0700 (PDT) >> From: HA <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] No delay between DHCP discoveries >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >> I have to connect some level converters to the Uart to print out debug >> messages. I did a grep of dhcp_discovery and it was only used inside >> dhcp.c. >> This file I have compared with the original and no difference. >> >> My thre timers run correctly, I can see it on the scope. Have no idea how >> the webserver could trigger dhcp_discovery. Will go through the code. Any >> other ideas? >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/No-delay-between-DHCP-discoveries-tp21927p21938.html >> Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:52:59 -0400 >> From: "Bill Auerbach" <[email protected]> >> To: "'Mailing list for lwIP users'" <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] No delay between DHCP discoveries >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> I would update to the latest (1.4.1). Your version is 6 or 7 years out of >> date. It shouldn't make a difference, but if it does, why debug something >> that may already be debugged? Besides, there are *many* bug fixes and >> features added over those years. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf >> Of HA >> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 4:35 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [lwip-users] No delay between DHCP discoveries >> >> I have to connect some level converters to the Uart to print out debug >> messages. I did a grep of dhcp_discovery and it was only used inside >> dhcp.c. >> This file I have compared with the original and no difference. >> >> My thre timers run correctly, I can see it on the scope. Have no idea how >> the webserver could trigger dhcp_discovery. Will go through the code. Any >> other ideas? >> >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> >> http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/No-delay-between-DHCP-discoveries-tp21927p2193 >> 8.html<http://lwip.100.n7.nabble.com/No-delay-between-DHCP-discoveries-tp21927p21938.html> >> Sent from the lwip-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lwip-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lwip-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users >> >> End of lwip-users Digest, Vol 122, Issue 5 >> ****************************************** >> > >
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
