Hi Ok, thank you. Best regards
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Sylvain Rochet <grada...@gradator.net> wrote: > Hi Mattia, > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:39:03PM +0100, Mattia Settin wrote: > > Hi > > Thanks > > Buh how is possible that: with an operative system > sys_timeouts_mbox_fetch call > > sys_check_timeouts() which is the handle timeouts for NO_SYS==1. > > Is the comment of sys_check_timeouts() wrong ? > > Well, I agree the comment could be improved for clarity. When we fixed > timers for NO_SYS==0 systems sys_check_timeouts was actually set > static[1] so it wasn't possible to mistakenly call this function. Looks > like it was changed when mbox handling moved to another file, therefore > clearing the static modifier. > > Sylvain > > > [1] http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/lwip.git/tree/src/ > core/timers.c?id=6adeb706a699da10f2841eea3671546407ec413a#n293 > > _______________________________________________ > lwip-users mailing list > lwip-users@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users > -- Mattia Settin Software and System Engineer
_______________________________________________ lwip-users mailing list lwip-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
