+1 Emmanuel
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Bert Greevenbosch < [email protected]> wrote: > +1 for WG adoption > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Cao Zhen (CZ) > Sent: 05 February 2013 11:27 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Lwip] Call for adoption of the lwig-terminology draft > > Dear All, > > At Atlanta, we discussed the lwig terminology draft > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-lwig-terms-00.txt), which is > short > but immediate catch of the terminologies used in IETF works on lightweight > protocols. > > We have discussed with area directors about adding this to the mile stones > of the working group. > > As its characteristics, we would like to push the document forward to make > it officially referable to the industrial. > > This message starts a one-week call for adoption of this document. Please > feedback your opinion before Next Tuesday. > > Thank you very much > > -Zhen & Robert > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip >
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
