+1 Carles
> +1 > Emmanuel > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Bert Greevenbosch < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 for WG adoption >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Cao Zhen (CZ) >> Sent: 05 February 2013 11:27 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [Lwip] Call for adoption of the lwig-terminology draft >> >> Dear All, >> >> At Atlanta, we discussed the lwig terminology draft >> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-lwig-terms-00.txt), which is >> short >> but immediate catch of the terminologies used in IETF works on >> lightweight >> protocols. >> >> We have discussed with area directors about adding this to the mile >> stones >> of the working group. >> >> As its characteristics, we would like to push the document forward to >> make >> it officially referable to the industrial. >> >> This message starts a one-week call for adoption of this document. >> Please >> feedback your opinion before Next Tuesday. >> >> Thank you very much >> >> -Zhen & Robert >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lwip mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip >> _______________________________________________ >> Lwip mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip >> > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip > _______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
