Dear Carsten and others
I've read the new draft and offer some suggestions, mostly editorial,
but there are a couple of other constraints that I think might merit
mentioning (particularly regularory), and a couple of questions I have
embedded in the text. The edited version is here:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/472780/draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-02_CGP.txt
and the changes may be found with diff.
Hope this may be of some use.
Regards - Charles
On 28/03/2013 16:47, Carsten Bormann wrote:
As we discussed in Orlando, a small design team charged ahead and wrote down
some power terminology, creating a new section 4 in the terminology draft.
Thanks Ari, Dominique, Peter.
And thanks Jari for letting us borrow some text out of lwig-cellular.
Please have a look:
A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-02
In Orlando, we said we wanted to time-box this into March, so:
-- Is this the section that we wanted?
-- Does this need major surgery, or can we do a couple small fixes and then go
for WGLC?
Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
--
Regards - Charles Palmer
Project Hydra Project Manager - Acute Technology Limited
Woodthorpe, Calver Road, Baslow, Derbyshire, DE45 1RR, United Kingdom
Mob: +44 (0)7977 577 627 Skype: Acutetech
Email: [email protected] Web: http://projecthydra.info
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
