Hi Carsten

The new text on regulatory constraints reads fine: it is enough to remind readers that there are legal as well as technical constraints. I had not intended to suggest that EN300 220-1 should be included in the text. I'll add more on this in a new thread.

Regards - Charles

On 31/03/2013 13:54, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Mar 31, 2013, at 12:34, Charles Palmer <[email protected]> 
wrote:

I've read the new draft and offer some suggestions, mostly editorial, but there 
are a couple of other constraints that I think might merit mentioning 
(particularly regularory), and a couple of questions I have embedded in the 
text. The edited version is here:
Thanks, those suggestions did allow me to improve the text.
I've left out the specific reference to EN 300 220-1 (assuming that was what 
you meant), but did add a bit of reference to regulatory issues (since we 
aren't defining terminology for them, a little reminder of them is all that is 
needed).
I already had changed all the lists that summarize the class numbers into 
tables; I was wondering whether examples in those tables help or give the 
impression the examples are the definition.  In the end I did add the examples 
to the Ex table.

I'm not sure we want to give too many examples for how the various classes go 
together; this would be ratholing quickly, and I trust readers will have enough 
phantasy to do this on their own.

So this makes the -03, just submitted:

Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-03
Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lwig-terminology-03

In separate news, I've also added Ari Keränen as a co-author, who has supplied 
and edited some of the power text.

Grüße, Carsten




--
Regards - Charles Palmer
Project Hydra Project Manager - Acute Technology Limited
Woodthorpe, Calver Road, Baslow, Derbyshire, DE45 1RR, United Kingdom
Mob: +44 (0)7977 577 627    Skype: Acutetech
Email: [email protected] Web: http://projecthydra.info

_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip

Reply via email to