Dear Yuanchen, Thanks for the review! See comments inline.
On Mar 2, 2014, at 9:34 PM, ma yc wrote: > I just roughly went through the draft. It is an interesting draft. I think it > is a good > approach to summarize the cellular and power efficiency for CoAP > implementation. > Following are some general comments. > > 1. There are personal drafts referred in this document. Some are not active > now, > for example, draft-vial-core-mirror-proxy, draft-castellani-core-alive, and > draft-fossati-core-publish-monitor-options. However in this draft the three > drafts > are described as the main candidate solutions in Chapter 8. > I think it better to focus on the delegation model description in this > chapter and > avoid talking about solutions since there is no consensus on solutions. > If necessary, the three personal drafts can be used just as example > approaches. That was the idea but apparently we need to make the text more clear on. Will fix that. > 2. The draft is focusing on power efficiency according to the abstract. > However chapter 5 seems to talk about cellular constraints. > the relation with power efficiency is not clearly identified. There should be > some words describing the role for discovery and registration in > the power efficiency context. Also it is better to add a few word in > the beginning of chapter 5 to clearly indicate that this draft focuses > on CoAP devices in cellular network. The idea is that when the devices are already power-efficient and hence perform in a certain kind of way (e.g., implement certain mechanisms and not others), how to take the constraints of a network, such as cellular, in to account. Will clarify this too. Thanks, Ari
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
