On 7 Dec 2015, at 7:18, Brian Haberman wrote:
[...]
Sure, could happen. But I think the versioning and all the alg ids
etc take care of that. There are already (by design) valid ways to
deploy the non-constrained side here that'd not interop with the
constrained side implementing this. (E.g. using certs for starters!)
So the kind of problem you envisage can already happen today and
that's ok.
The above is the view I hold as well. I talked through the "copy vs
reference" with Tero and the WG chairs during my evaluation and
reached
the conclusion that the copy approach was fine in an Informational
document.
I've cleared my discuss on the informational status, and it seems like I
am in the minority in being worried about the copy vs reference
approach. So while I have not changed that opinion, I am perfectly happy
to be declared in-the-weeds.
Thanks!
Ben.
_______________________________________________
Lwip mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
