Hi all, I wonder whether it is time to revise RFC 7228 (or to update it). I am particularly interested to adjust the description of the constrained device classes since we (after some years of work) now know so much more about the software requirements.
What is missing IMHO from the classes is a description of what we expect these devices to run. I think we need to get the expectation set correctly. I believe that this would be a good topic for discussion at the next IETF meeting (since I saw a meeting request from the LWIG chairs flying around). Ciao Hannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list Lwip@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
