On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi all, > > I wonder whether it is time to revise RFC 7228 (or to update it). I am > particularly interested to adjust the description of the constrained > device classes since we (after some years of work) now know so much more > about the software requirements. > > What is missing IMHO from the classes is a description of what we expect > these devices to run. I think we need to get the expectation set correctly. > > +1 for revisiting/reevaluating this (already useful) document. > I believe that this would be a good topic for discussion at the next > IETF meeting (since I saw a meeting request from the LWIG chairs flying > around). > > Ciao > Hannes > > > _______________________________________________ > Lwip mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip > >
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
