On 22 June 2016 at 14:39:52, Abhijan Bhattacharyya ([email protected]) wrote: That is understood. The point is that, there is an element of doubt regarding whether the implementations in reality abide by the given time interval or silently times out without the knowledge of the end-points. There is no doubt at all :-/
http://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2010/papers/p260.pdf Figure 7, Section 4.2: "More than half the devices fail to meet the IETF recommended timeout of 124 min” This study is a few years old, but I would be surprised if the situation has become much better. (Are there newer studies of this type?) Grüße, Carsten
_______________________________________________ Lwip mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip
