On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:30:18 -0500
"Michael H. Warfield" <m...@wittsend.com> wrote:
> Deep down below... A correction...
>
> On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 11:57 -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 11:54 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> > > Hello,
> >
> > > After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all
> > > of you aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull
> > > request of the staging branch on the 10th of December (next
> > > Monday).
> >
> > > This pull request will very likely contain everything that's
> > > currently in the staging branch and is intended to become
> > > 0.9.alpha1.
> >
> > > I'd therefore recommend everyone tests the current staging branch
> > > and sends any remaining bugfixes to the mailing list as soon as
> > > possible.
> >
> > > Also, if a change you sent to the mailing-list hasn't been
> > > applied yet, it's very likely because I missed it as according to
> > > my mail client, there's no outstanding patch to review. In such
> > > case, please reply to this e-mail with a reference to your change
> > > and I'll make sure it's reviewed before I send the pull request.
> >
> > Notes in building on Fedora 17...
> >
> > *) Manual configure and build:
> >
> > configure --help lists --enable-apparmor as an option but does not
> > list --disable-apparmor. The default is enabled and the
> > --disable-apparmor has to be used to build on Fedora without
> > AppArmor.
> >
> > Sort of cosmetic since most of us building by hand know to invert
> > the sense of that enable but I think that help listing could use
> > some touching up.
Hi, I'm building on Fedora 17 too for some testing. I've noticed this
once in a while, even though there are configure checks which should
check for sys/apparmor.h. I haven't been able to track down why it
sometimes doesn't work, it is a bit annoying when the autodetect
doesn't work :(
> > *) Building rpms using the lxc.spec file in the package...
> >
> > With the existing lxc.spec file, rpmbuild blows up on Fedora 17 with
> > this:
> >
> > --
> > checking for docbook2man... yes
> > checking sys/apparmor.h usability... no
> > checking sys/apparmor.h presence... no
> > checking for sys/apparmor.h... no
> > configure: error: You must install the AppArmor development package
> > in order to compile lxc
> > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8VlE1L (%build)
> >
> >
> > RPM build errors:
> > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8VlE1L (%build)
> > --
> >
> > So it looks like --disable-apparmor needs to be added to the
> > lxc.spec.in file around line 65 (lxc-spec line 66):
> >
> > PATH=$PATH:/usr/sbin:/sbin %configure $args --disable-apparmor
> > --disable-rpath
> >
> > Even after that, I run into this problem building an rpm:
> >
> > Fedora rpmbuild is also NOT liking this:
> >
> > %{_bindir}/*
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-attach
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-create
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-clone
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-shutdown
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-start
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-netstat
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-unshare
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-execute
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-checkpoint
> > %attr(4111,root,root) %{_bindir}/lxc-restart
> >
> > Results in this...
> >
> > RPM build errors:
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-attach
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-checkpoint
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-clone
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-create
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-execute
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-netstat
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-restart
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-shutdown
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-start
> > File listed twice: /usr/bin/lxc-unshare
> >
> > I had to comment out the "%{_bindir}/*" line. That's probably not
> > right but I'm not sure how to resolve the dups due to the wildcard
> > statement.
>
> Yeah, that was a bad move. That resulted in things like lxc-ls not
> being packaged. My bad. So we want all those explicitly listed to be
> SUID to root? We may have to list every binary individually in order
> to avoid the duplicate warnings but it turns out they're not fatal
> anyways (the failure at that point had been caused the problem below
> not the duplicates above).
Yeah, the duplicates are just warnings, but we probably should fix it by
listing the files individually instead of using the glob.
> > Also got a /usr/local/var/lib/lxc in there at line 100 that's
> > "@LXCPATH@". That doesn't look right. Shouldn't that have ended
> > up /var/lib/lxc without the "/usr/local" part? Shouldn't that be
> > using the rpm macros there too?
When you run ./configure, you have to pass the same options rpmbuild
will to make sure LXCPATH gets expanded right.
> > After making those corrections, I was able to build rpms for F17
> > and I'm starting testing from them now.
> >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mike
>
> Regards,
> Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
