On 12/10/2012 12:59 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:36 -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: >> On 12/10/2012 12:30 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: >>> On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 12:09 -0500, Dwight Engen wrote: >>>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 10:35:17 -0500 >>>> Stéphane Graber <stgra...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 12/05/2012 11:54 AM, Stéphane Graber wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> After discussing this briefly with Daniel, I wanted to make all of >>>>>> you aware that we are currently planning on sending a pull request >>>>>> of the staging branch on the 10th of December (next Monday). >>>>>> >>>>>> This pull request will very likely contain everything that's >>>>>> currently in the staging branch and is intended to become >>>>>> 0.9.alpha1. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd therefore recommend everyone tests the current staging branch >>>>>> and sends any remaining bugfixes to the mailing list as soon as >>>>>> possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, if a change you sent to the mailing-list hasn't been applied >>>>>> yet, it's very likely because I missed it as according to my mail >>>>>> client, there's no outstanding patch to review. In such case, >>>>>> please reply to this e-mail with a reference to your change and >>>>>> I'll make sure it's reviewed before I send the pull request. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> As far as I'm concerned, the staging branch is now ready for the >>>>> release of 0.9.alpha1. >>>>> >>>>> I plan on sending the merge proposal later this afternoon >>>>> (in 5-6 hours) after I've run some more tests on it. >>>>> >>>>> Test packages for Ubuntu can be found at: >>>>> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-lxc/+archive/daily/+packages >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you're aware of any critical bug currently affecting staging, >>>>> please speak up now :) >>> >>>> Its not critical, but I think the above patch that replaces @LXCPATH@ >>>> with %{_localstatedir}/* in the spec file should go in to fix building >>>> on Fedora. It'd be nice to hear an ack from Michael though :) >>> >>> Aaaahhhh! I meant to test that patch and got distracted. Just tested. >>> Everything worked and the builds went fine on F17. I'm good with it. >>> The current staging plus that change builds Fedora rpms just fine. >>> >>> Acked-by: Michael H. Warfield <m...@wittsend.com> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Mike > >> Took a bit of digging to find what patch you were referring to but I >> think I picked up the right one and pushed to staging :) > > Tested. And we are good. Only thing in there is adjusting for the > version number (it currently claims 0.8.0) but that's normal for any > build spec in my experience. > >> Thanks > > Regards, > Mike
Good. The plan is to send the pull-request without the commit changing the version number and let Daniel pull and add that commit. -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
