On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Guido Jäkel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17.02.2016 21:54, hari wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Guido Jäkel <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Dear Hari, > >> > >> It might be easier for us if you name the driver or the usecase. Maybe > in > >> fact you don't want to pass in the "driver" but the "resource" provided > by > >> the driver. > >> > > > > Dear Guido, > > > > The driver I am using interacts with PMU (special hardware registers) and > > enables performance monitoring using the hardware counters available. It > is > > similar to perf tool. > > What I am trying to do is to monitor the performance from inside the > > container rather than from the host. > > > > Thanks, > > TG > > > >> > >> greetings > >> > >> Guido > >> > > Dear Hari, > > this futile by concept, because a lightweight container is thought not own > any dedicated parts of a real CPU or any other physical resource of the > host, it just is a logical platform with resources to "compute", to access > a "file system" or to do "networking". > > You may load the "PMU driver" on the host and monitor on the host the > resources used by the processes inside the container. And you may be able > to setup a way to pass in the monitoring results (and/or the controll and > command interface if you ignore any concerns of security) to the container. > Dear Guido, I apologize for the delay in replying. Thank you for your insight. I understood it is pointless to do this. I could monitor all the processes within a container from host side itself. That would do for now :) Thank you all for helping. Regards, TG > > Guido > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users >
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
