Hello, > Currently using apt-cacher-ng here, works great. What are possible benefits of your solution?
apt-cacher-ng is definitely a better option for production. This is an experimental (for now) solution that I would like to put out into the wild to see if it is useful for small-scale updates on local-machines (eg. updating your 5-10 containers you have running locally). On 21/09/2016 20:47, [email protected] wrote: > Re: [lxc-users] Experimental cache-updater between containers (LXC) _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
