> Currently using apt-cacher-ng here, works great. What are possible
benefits of your solution?

apt-cacher-ng is definitely a better option for production. This is an
experimental (for now) solution that I would like to put out into the
wild to see if it is useful for small-scale updates on local-machines
(eg. updating your 5-10 containers you have running locally).

On 21/09/2016 20:47, lxc-users-requ...@lists.linuxcontainers.org wrote:
> Re: [lxc-users] Experimental cache-updater between containers (LXC)

lxc-users mailing list

Reply via email to