Hey,
Thanks for the reply!
Is there any way so scope the `available` memory so that it doesn’t the host’s
total memory ?
Thanks!
Martín
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 2:54 PM Andrey Repin < Andrey Repin ( Andrey Repin
<[email protected]> ) > wrote:
>
>
>
> Greetings, Martín Fernández!
>
> > Stéphane,
> > That seems to have done the trick :). Now a I see different outputs when
>
> > running `free` on the container than in the host. At the same time,
> > non-restarted containers are showing the host output which sound good as
> well.
> > One last question, If I don’t limit the amount of memory a container has
>
> > it should show the host available memory right ?
> > Asking this because I have the following situation that for sure it not
> right.
> > Host ```
> > total used free shared buffers cached
> > Mem: 32109 25432 6676 9 1297 18510
> > -/+ buffers/cache: 5624 26484
> > Swap: 138699 893 137806
> > ```
>
> >
> > Container (the restarted one):
> > ```
> >
> > total used free shared buffers cached
> > Mem: 32109 951 31157 9 0 256
> > -/+ buffers/cache: 695 31414
> > Swap: 138699 893 137806
> > ```
>
>
> > The container is showing that it has 31157 megabytes free but that is
> > obviously this is not true based on what the host is showing (6676).
>
> The "free" memory is "available minus used (by non-discardable data)".
> So, no, it just can't show actual free memory inside a container, no.
>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Andrey Repin
> Wednesday, June 6, 2018 20:53:07
>
> Sorry for my terrible english...
> _______________________________________________
> lxc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
lxc-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
