The Achilles' heel is the type of CPU. I had to recompile my app once I moved it to an older CPU. Nothing is portable 100%. I guess nothing allows you to get rid of the developer at the end of the day.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:25 PM Fajar A. Nugraha <l...@fajar.net> wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 8:18 PM Saint Michael <vene...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for the F grade. >> In telecommunications, there is a special kind of software apps called >> switches, which actually involve dozens of apps, scripts, etc. That kind of >> complexity is only packageable in a container. >> > > It's a matter of choice. AT&T seems to go with VMs and openstack: > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/01/08/att_expanding_sdn/ > > That being said, https://anbox.io/ does something similar with you: they > package complex apps using lxc. In their case, they use snaps for > distribution, and then use lxc internally. > > -- > Fajar > > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users >
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users