On 04/26/2012 07:09 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> From: Serge Hallyn<serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
>
> Author: Timothy Chen<tnac...@gmail.com>
> Bug-Ubuntu: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/980902
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn<serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
> Cc: Timothy Chen<tnac...@gmail.com>
> ---
>   src/lxc/lxc-destroy.in |    1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc-destroy.in b/src/lxc/lxc-destroy.in
> index b0f2da5..17fa6d6 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxc-destroy.in
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxc-destroy.in
> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ lxc-info -n $lxc_name 2>/dev/null | grep -q RUNNING
>   if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
>       if [ $force -eq 1 ]; then
>               lxc-stop -n $lxc_name
> +             lxc-wait -n $lxc_name -s STOPPED
>       else
>               echo "Container $lxc_name is running, aborting the deletion."
>               exit 1

I don't get why this is needed, lxc-stop is synchronous. When the 
lxc-stop command exits, we have the guarantee the container has stopped. 
If it is not the case, that means there is a problem somewhere else.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users

Reply via email to