On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Andrej N. Gritsenko <[email protected]> 
wrote: 
    The only problem is that GTK is C but Qt is C++... 

This are the reason why QT ar few more heavy than other, but also the 
reason why are more easy to devel in it

On Th, 23 apr 2013 00:34:05 UTC-4:30, PCMan wrote:
>
> Instead of having two incomplete DEs, at least we can have a really good 
> one. 
>
>
Let's face it, with this, the users who will benefit will be those of 
"razorqt" since LXDE hav many things (although come from third-party 
programs) working, plus LXDE only consumes between 80 and 160 Mb, while due 
scale of qt4/qt5 framework razorqt obviously needs more resources 
(significative more)...

in linux have ram and cpu cycles is everything .. since in Linux everything 
is a file (access I / O, vs cpu cycles) and that affects the ram consumption


*for razorqt this are the best notice in years... truly... for lxde 
relateds, this are only a plus....*

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AlienVault Unified Security Management (USM) platform delivers complete
security visibility with the essential security capabilities. Easily and
efficiently configure, manage, and operate all of your security controls
from a single console and one unified framework. Download a free trial.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/alienvault_d2d
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list

Reply via email to