2015-08-19 21:13 GMT+02:00 Jerome Leclanche <jer...@leclan.ch>:
> Once again:
> * This is not a relicensing. This is a cleanup. Copyright and
> licenses will not change.
> * Our current headers are broken. New files get added in all the time
> with incorrect or outdated copyright notices. Some completely new
> files are still referencing Razor-qt.
> * As long as we are inconsistent with our headers, this will keep
> happening. The rules are unclear right now and the goal is to clarify
> them *and* make them simpler.
>
> I'm dropping this for now due to negative feedback. I'll have a new
> and more detailed draft up in the coming weeks on this which we'll be
> able to discuss then. I understand the concerns raised here but
> please, remember that what we have currently is a lot worse.
>
>
> Hi Jerome
Please don't take what I've said as a criticism of your efforts. I agree
that the situation we have now is unsustainable and your work is much
appreciated.
Here's a proposal you may consider when doing that draft. It is
intentionally minimalistic:
/*
* Copyright (c) *{list of authors for *this* file}*
*
* This file is part of the LXQt project. <http://lxqt.org>
* It is distributed under the LGPL 2.1 or later license.
* Please refer to the LICENSE file for a copy of the license.
*/
Information about who is contributing to LXQt should be on the web site (
lxqt.org).
br. Chr.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Lxde-list mailing list
Lxde-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxde-list
