On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Walter Ian Kaye wrote: > At 07:20p -0500 03/16/2004, Thomas Dickey didst inscribe upon an > electronic papyrus: > > >On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Walter Ian Kaye wrote: > > > > > At 06:07a +0900 03/17/2004, Henry Nelson didst inscribe upon an > > > electronic papyrus: > > > > > > >On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:55:29AM -0800, Walter Ian Kaye wrote: > > > > > "content-type viewing" thread; by setting the charset to > > > > > "Transparent", I get the page (although entities are not decoded). > > > > > Weird. (Weird from *my* perspective, because I expect pages to > > > > > display without having to lose entity rendering.) > > > > > > > >I'm not sure of what is meant by "entity", > > > > > > © or & or ... -- you know, entities. > > > > > > I just don't see why I have to trade off decoding entities for > >decoding gzip. > > > If Lynx can do both, and they are not mutually exclusive, then why? > > > >There's no runtime setting to control whether lynx tells the host it > >can accept gzip'd pages. (Not every feature in the code has a config > >setting). > > What is the answer, then? What is necessary in order for me to view > gzipped pages with rendering intact? Why does Lynx have a problem > with this? Is it just that no one ever noticed?
No one noticed (not unusual since there are a lot of badly-written pages). Try running the W3C validator on this one. -- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
