Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 01:59:39AM -0700, Bela Lubkin wrote: > > RFC 6265 obsoleted RFC 2965 in 2011; it says: > > sure - that's > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=820485 > > If you have time to work on this, I'll review/etc a patch. > Otherwise, I'll eventually get around to it.
Debbug 820485 is actually about other differences between Lynx behavior and RFC 6265 (i.e.: whether cookies are indexed by host port or not -- 6265 says not). It would potentially be reasonable to *act* on the bug report as if it broadly said 'Lynx is not RFC 6265 compatible', and fix everything that could be found. I don't intend to work on any aspect of it. >Bela< _______________________________________________ Lynx-dev mailing list Lynx-dev@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
