> When Davis was posting to this news group, he pointed out that slcurses 
> may not have the complete curses functionality wanted in lynx. But, I find 
> it difficult to believe that libpdcurses, which compiles to 50 KB on my 
> machine, could really have that much more functionality than libslang that 
> compiles to 400 KB. 

most of libslang is a language interpreter - with a subset of curses added.
(comparing the size of lynx built with curses and slang, the latter is about
2% smaller, so the curses subset in slang is probably comparable to pdcurses).

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey

Reply via email to