> When Davis was posting to this news group, he pointed out that slcurses > may not have the complete curses functionality wanted in lynx. But, I find > it difficult to believe that libpdcurses, which compiles to 50 KB on my > machine, could really have that much more functionality than libslang that > compiles to 400 KB. most of libslang is a language interpreter - with a subset of curses added. (comparing the size of lynx built with curses and slang, the latter is about 2% smaller, so the curses subset in slang is probably comparable to pdcurses). -- Thomas E. Dickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp.... too much unencr... Leonid Pauzner
- Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp.... too much un... Gisle Vanem
- Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp.... too much un... Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp.... too muc... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp.... too... Philip Webb
- Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp.... too much un... Klaus Weide
- Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp.... too muc... Leonid Pauzner
- patch (was: Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp... Leonid Pauzner
- Re: patch (was: Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:p... Klaus Weide
- lynx-dev Suggestion for merging the libcurses and lib... vtailor
- Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp.... too much unencripted... Henry Nelson
- Re: lynx-dev ftp://user:passw@ftp.... too much unencripted... Larry W. Virden